A small river in upstate New York bounced back fast after a long standing barrier came out. A new study followed the water before and after the dam removal and tracked how the habitat, water quality, and small aquatic life changed.

The results show a clear pattern. When a dam stops slowing water and trapping sediment, the channel rebuilds itself, oxygen levels rise, and the community of living things resets.

Before and after dam removal

“The research demonstrates the resilience of nature to recover from imperiled states,” said lead author Jeremy Dietrich, principal aquatic ecologist at the New York State Water Resources Institute at Cornell University.

He and colleagues monitored the site from the summer before removal through the third year after.

The barrier was a 12 foot structure installed in the 1960s to hold a small reservoir.

After the dam removal, the slow pool upstream shifted toward a stony channel with steady current, and the differences between upstream and downstream sections faded.

Recovery after dam removal

The team relied on macroinvertebrates, the insects, worms, and other small animals without backbones that live on stream bottoms.

These organisms respond quickly to changes in flow and substrate, so they are reliable indicators of stream health.

New York uses the Biological Assessment Profile (BAP) to score water quality based on that community. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher values signaling healthier conditions.

Before removal, the impounded reach had soft sand and silt, which favors burrowers and low oxygen tolerant species.

After removal, gravel and cobble expanded, and clinging insects that need cleaner, faster water moved in.

From silty and still to rocky and flowing

Scientists often describe still water as lentic and flowing water as lotic. The upstream reach shifted from lentic conditions to lotic conditions once the channel reformed and the fine sediments moved out.

Those physical changes matched biological ones from the first year onward.

Taxa richness and the number of sensitive EPT groups, the mayflies, stoneflies, and caddisflies, rose in the former reservoir reach while tolerant taxa declined as habitat improved.

The study documented a jump in upstream BAP score from the “moderately impacted” range to the “slightly impacted” range by year three.

That change signals that the site moved out of biological impairment and into a condition that can support a diverse community.

Fish on the move again

Dams do more than trap sediment. They block movement for species that need to travel between salt water and fresh water during their life cycles, a pattern biologists call diadromous.

American eels are catadromous, which means they grow in rivers and estuaries and return to the Sargasso Sea to spawn. The new channel opened upstream access to rearing habitat that had been off limits.

Juvenile eels can now reach cooler, oxygen rich stretches that support growth. Restoring that passage is one of the most direct ecological wins when a small barrier comes out.

Numbers that tell the story

By year three, upstream habitat composition in the former impoundment was dominated by gravel and cobble instead of sand and silt.

The macroinvertebrate community shifted toward clingers and grazers that feed on algae growing on rock surfaces.

The BAP score in the upstream reach rose into the “slightly impacted” band. Sensitive EPT taxa increased several fold, and overall taxa richness roughly doubled, showing a stable and diverse community had taken hold.

This case fits a bigger national pattern. In 2024, there were 108 removals across 27 states that reconnected more than 2,528 miles of upstream habitat.

Removing the right barriers can improve water quality, increase habitat variety, and make rivers safer for communities. It can also reduce maintenance risks tied to aging infrastructure.

Cost and common sense

Many older dams are expensive to repair and keep up to code. Rehabilitating non-federal dams carries an estimated nationwide price-tag of about 165.2 billion dollars.

Communities weigh those bills against the benefits of free flowing streams, improved fish passage, and fewer liability concerns. In many cases, taking out a small, obsolete barrier is the practical option.

Two ingredients stood out. First, the stream had healthy downstream habitat that could seed the new channel with sensitive taxa once conditions improved.

Second, the restored channel developed coarse substrate quickly, which boosted oxygen exchange and created surfaces for algae and microbes that fuel the food web.

Those changes support clinging and grazing insects that form the base of a productive stream.

Dam removals and conservation

Not every site will respond on the same timeline. Recovery speed depends on gradient, how much fine sediment is stored, watershed land use, and how intact nearby source populations are.

This project shows how a simple monitoring plan can track progress clearly.

A short list of indicators, substrate size, macroinvertebrate groups, and BAP score, gave managers a transparent way to judge when a site has met its target.

One removal is good, and many removals in the right places can be even better.

Repeating small, strategic projects across a watershed can stitch together longer corridors for fish and re-build natural transport of sediment and nutrients.

That kind of connectivity helps streams handle floods, heat waves, and shifting seasons. It also makes local wins add up to regional gains.

Healthy flow and connected habitat set the stage for life to return. When small, aging barriers come out, streams can heal faster than many people expect.

The study is published in Ecosphere.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–